The Black Technology Era of Xueba

Eugene was originally Fisher's assistant and student. After seeing Pangu Technology's launch of the neuron chip, he felt deja vu.

This feeling drives him to find the connection between the two.

It was found that Pangu's research on thinking and the research and development of neuron chips were actually in-depth, improved and perfected on the basis of Professor Feher's research from the Brain Research Institute more than 20 years ago.

That is to say, the current research results of Pangu Technology were put forward by the European Brain Institute 20 years ago.

But there is a problem. The research of Professor Fisher of the European Brain Institute on this issue was considered nonsense by the research institute twenty years ago. Professor Fisher himself was also subject to the technology of the time, and only raised his questions on this topic. My own thoughts are not as deep as research. Therefore, this research topic has been placed there.

Fisher returned to the United States because he was not valued in the European laboratory and his research results came to an end, and published his research directions and conjectures in a non-professional academic weekly.

Note that only research directions and conjectures are published, not research results.

In the next ten or twenty years, the name Fisher almost disappeared in the academic world, and no one knows where he is now, and whether he is still engaged in brain and thinking research.

Fisher's research on the Posner cluster is also disappearing, gradually being forgotten by academia.

If Pangu Technology hadn't come up with a neuron chip this time, the term Posner cluster would have long been forgotten by humans.

Pangu Technology is not plagiarizing Fisher's research results, because Fisher has no research results at all, but only put forward his own ideas and concepts.

However, there is a convention in academics. Whoever proposes a concept and names it, then later generations will generally follow this name when they study it.

Posner set is also the English description of Pangu Technology, and the Chinese description is a neuron cluster.

So to sum up, it is impossible to talk about Pangu Technology's plagiarism of the research results of Fisher and the European Brain Thinking Laboratory, because they have no results at all.

But as a member of the European Institute, as a proud European, Eugene was very excited to discover such clues and informed the top of the Institute of his findings.

This matter also aroused great attention from the high-level European academic circles. They quickly arranged to find all traces of Fisher's research in detail, and sent people to contact Professor Fisher in the United States, hoping that he could stand up and explain. .

The results were mixed.

Fortunately, after rummaging through the cabinets to find Professor Fisher's research materials, they found that Fisher's manuscripts and assumptions research steps, as well as the results of their own conjectures, have too many similarities with the results of Pangu Technology.

The worry is that after contacting Professor Fisher's family in the United States, he learned that Professor Fisher had passed away five years ago, and he had no results before his death.

It doesn't matter, it's better to talk when people die.

I don't know if Europeans want to regain their dignity or if they are going to touch porcelain. The European Brain Institute used Fisher's research report to vigorously write a long paper and complaint report on thinking and brain research.

The content of the complaint report is obvious,

Pangu Technology plagiarized the results of the European Brain Research Institute, and it was a free prostitute.

During this period of time, the European media, which were severely suppressed by Pangu Technology, were still thinking after seeing the control report, should they reprint it?

After all, the negative reports on Pangu Technology some time ago caused great losses to the European media.

In this day and age, fake news and slanderous news are not so easy to spread.

Because you have the right to post it, and the super junior has the right to technically clean up your rights. It's such a hooligan, it's just so unreasonable.

But this time seems to be different.

The research results and complaint reports of the European Brain Research Center seem to be well-founded, and the supporting materials they provide are research results twenty years ago, while the research results of Pangu Technology are the latest, that is to say, Pangu Technology has It may be plagiarizing the academic achievements of the European Brain Research Center.

Eugene was brought to the fore by the European Brain Institute two decades ago as Fisher's assistant.

In an interview with the media, Eugene said with great certainty: Twenty years ago, my mentor, Professor Fisher, a well-known expert in brain and thinking research, proposed the Posner cluster, and he definitely proposed the idea of ​​brain thinking. Formation is actually a kind of quantum motion, and he also proposed that this quantum motion can actually be linked to quantum devices based on quantum chips.

Said here, Eugene's expression was bleak, he said: Later, Professor Fisher faded out of the laboratory for physical reasons, but as his student, my team and I have been doing research on this experiment, we leading results.”

A few years ago, there were several Chinese researchers in our institute who joined our research group in the name of students or visitors. Later, our relevant information about the Posner cluster was lost, and later...

Having said this, Eugene shrugged.

Eugene also has ambitions in his heart, such a major research and development achievement will definitely win the Nobel Prize! What he has to do is to tell the world that Pangu Technology is stealing and using the results of the European Brain Institute, and that all the achievements that Pangu Technology and Xiao Ming have obtained originally belonged to the European Brain Institute and Eugene.

There is order and evidence, and evidence from twenty years ago.

Eugene even turned to a paper on Posner clusters published by his mentor Fisher in a third-rate academic journal twenty years earlier as proof.

The originally silent European public opinion circles, under the urging of European political factors and academic circles, reported the incident and pointed the finger at Pangu Technology.

European academic circles believe that this is an excellent opportunity to attack Pangu Technology and establish European academic self-confidence.

Before the European media reports, many European academic groups and organizations supported Eugene and the European Brain Institute behind him, and strongly condemned academic plagiarism. They demanded that the relevant laboratories apologize to the European Brain Institute. , and in accordance with the guidelines of peers in academia, submit follow-up results to the European Brain Institute free of charge.

This is rogue academicism in Europe.

The public opinion circle was not idle either. They reported the interview with Eugene in detail, and disclosed the research materials provided by Eugene twenty years ago.

The Times commented: The Posner cluster is the crystallization of European scientific research, but it was plagiarized by the Xia people and used for the flower of evil.

Genius for a second to remember the address of this site: . Mobile version reading website: