Meet the principal

Act 20. Review comments

"You mean, that Rainer Inglete found Antoine?"

In Prest City, dozens of miles away from Crescent College, in an extremely luxurious office, a man with a slender head put down his pipe and stared at Sanderson with sharp eyes, which made the thin guy couldn't help but Had a cold war.

"Yes, Lord Piram, they seem to have reached an agreement. I have found someone to keep an eye on the old street these two days. Antoine is indeed producing something."

Sanderson did not dare to look his boss in the eyes, answered timidly, and then asked in a low voice.

"Isn't it difficult to deal with Iain Gray's house?"

"You don't need to say anything."

Piram glanced at Sanderson and silenced him, not daring to move.

"Let's continue to find out what they are working on first. It's best to get samples back."

"Okay sir."

Sanderson nodded repeatedly, not daring to disobey.

"You go down first."

Piram waved his hand, and Sanderson slipped away without daring to make a sound.

The office door was closed, Piram blew out a smoke ring and looked at the opened letters on the table.

The sender of the letter is Hyrule Ingle, the second son of the Ingle family.

The letter briefly explained the current situation of the Ingle family. Only then did Piram know what had happened to this business empire and why the playboy Rainer Ingle was admitted to Crescent College.

Piram was promoted by Hyrule and received his first funding, which enabled him to achieve his current wealth and status, so he respected Hyrule quite a bit.

At this time, Hyrule learned that his incompetent brother had come to Crescent College, and hoped that Piram could educate this inexperienced noble young master about the reality of the world.

On the one hand, he lamented that the Ingles were so unfeeling even to their family members, on the other hand, Piram had a legitimate reason to deal with Antoine.

"I'm sorry, Master Reiner, it seems I have to cause you trouble."

Said to himself, Piram looked at a picture frame on the table.

In the photo frame, there was originally a group photo of three people, but one of them had his head blackened, which looked quite scary.

"As for Antoine, it's time for you to pay the price."

Piram clenched his fists, the sound of joints echoed in the office, and a little electricity flashed in the air.

...

Thousands of miles away in the Rainbow Tower, jury member Green hesitated again and again, watching the clock on the wall pass by one by one.

There is still half an hour before the deadline for the paper review. He must write and submit the review opinions for the paper in hand before then. Otherwise, it will be considered a dereliction of duty. Not only will his points be deducted, but he will also be in trouble. Eligibility review.

But Green's review opinion has been brewing for three days.

He wanted to start writing countless times, but gave up the idea again and again, and finally postponed it to this time.

"Forget it, if something really goes wrong, just leave it to the higher-level review committee."

In the end, Green gritted his teeth and began to write his review opinions on the parchment.

"The paper successfully prepared a brand-new gas with special properties by modifying common experiments. At the same time, based on this, the paper raised several questions about the process of the fire element combustion reaction..."

Green first summarized Reiner's entire paper based on his own understanding, and then commented on the experiment itself. Since the experiment in the paper is very detailed, the points that should be taken into consideration are basically taken into consideration, so this part did not cost too much. of pen and ink.

Next comes the comment part.

Green thought for a while, swallowed, dipped his quill in ink, and then continued writing.

"Based on the above reasons,

I think this paper is quite groundbreaking and rigorous. It is the first time that substances before and after the experiment were quantitatively weighed. Its research ideas are worth learning from. At the same time, the experimental design is rigorous and in-depth, basically demonstrating this new Various properties of gases..."

After writing this, Green paused. The next discussion about combustion reactions was the most important. He took a deep breath and continued writing.

"...Several questions about the combustion reaction in the experiment are of great value for discussion. Unfortunately, they were not explored in depth. This is a shortcoming of the paper, but the spirit of questioning and inquiry displayed in it is worthy of recognition. The involved The problem is enough to attract the attention of all alchemists..."

After writing a comment that he couldn't believe, Green sighed and finally wrote down the review score.

"The paper is approved and it is recommended to award one hundred academic points."

...

In another office in Rainbow Tower, Garen had already finished writing the review comments for his paper and was currently reviewing it.

"...The experimental method designed in this paper is groundbreaking and inspiring. The format of the paper is strict and the logic is clear. However, due to the author's lack of understanding of the latest theories, there are limitations of the times, which makes the paper's The conclusion contains obvious errors and its content is for reference only. The paper has been approved and it is recommended to award ten academic points."

Putting down the review comments, Garen took a sip of coffee.

According to common sense, a paper with such wrong conclusions should not be approved. However, considering that Mr. Fleming’s paper has not yet been published, it is quite rare to be able to write such a paper in this environment, so Gallon I still decided to give the author some encouragement through the paper.

Moreover, he really liked the neat format of this paper, and even had the idea of ​​writing papers in this format in the future.

After ringing the bell, Gallon put the paper review comments into the transmission array on the table. A ball of green flame burned and quickly devoured the parchment.

...

Two floors above Gallon's office, review member Angele had just finished his review. This paper was so impactful that he immediately sent it to his old friend who runs an academic journal. After receiving the letter, I was very excited.

As the final submission time approached, he took another look at the review comments he had written.

"...The experimental method of this paper is groundbreaking. For the first time, quantitative analysis is used to monitor the entire experiment process. It has an intuitive display of the changes in the mass of the object before and after the experiment. At the same time, the gas generated during the experiment is It has extremely special properties and broad application prospects. Finally, the experiment raised reasonable doubts about the traditional combustion reaction of fire elements. Due to limited knowledge, I cannot answer these questions, but I believe that these doubts will lead the direction of the alchemy department. A brand new development direction. Accordingly, the paper is approved and it is recommended to award two hundred academic points."

Two hundred academic points is already a very high reward. In the field of alchemy, usually only those who discover new elements can barely reach this number. It also depends on the practical value of the new elements.

But Angele felt that this paper did have this value, and it was not excessive, so he nodded and put the paper into the teleportation circle.

Tap the screen to use advanced tools Tip: You can use left and right keyboard keys to browse between chapters.

You'll Also Like