Extraordinary understanding: from mathematical emperor to civilized leader

In a laboratory.

Professor Winniberg stood in front of an instrument with a serious expression, waiting for the results of the experimental data.

Just then, his interns ran over.

"What's the matter, so flustered?"

Professor Winniberg was a little upset.

He ruled early on that no running or loud noise should be allowed in the lab.

The intern was accustomed to the seriousness of his supervisor, and said a little embarrassed: "It was your email address, sent by the Journal of Symbolic Logic, I looked at it, and asked you to review the manuscript." "

Professor Weinberg said with a dark face: "Even if it is a review, it is not a big deal, you have to be in such a hurry?" "

The intern said with a bitter face: "Didn't you say that all the emails about Sitapan conjecture will be told to you immediately?" "

Professor Winniberg's eyes lit up as soon as he heard Sitapan guess these words.

Because when he was younger, he spent a year and a half delving into the Sitapan conjecture, but in the end he failed.

So he remembers this conjecture deeply, and he hates it very much!

Even though he did not study the Sitapan conjecture for the next twenty years, he could not forget it in his mind.

Therefore, each of his interns would be instructed by him to pay attention to the latest developments in the academic community regarding the Sitapan conjecture, and to notify him as soon as there was a breakthrough.

Professor Winniberg said a little excitedly: "What is the title of that paper after you looked?" "

The intern said: "The Proof Process of the Sitapan Conjecture." "

Professor Winniberg was taken aback.

He also thought that only part of the progress had been made, but he did not expect that someone directly said that he had proved the Sitapan conjecture.

"You are here to help me look at the experimental data, and then record it, I will go to review the manuscript immediately!"

After Professor Winniberg finished speaking, without waiting for the intern to agree, he hurriedly pushed open the door and left.

After arriving at his office, Professor Winniberg found the email and immediately opened it.

“...... Suppose there is an infinite graph whose vertices correspond to all natural numbers, and any two vertices have an edge, and now any two dye these edges, and no matter how you dye, you must find infinite vertices, and the edges between them are dyed the same color..."

“...... Every infinite binary tree must contain an infinitely long branch..."

“...... Therefore, RT_2^2 cannot push WKL..."

Professor Winniberg was anxious, so he scanned the entire paper almost at a glance.

When he saw that it was written at the end that the Sitapan conjecture was rejected, his whole person gradually relaxed, and his brows loosened, as if he had accomplished something big.

"I didn't see any problems when I browsed quickly, now take a closer look..."

Professor Winniberg turned the paper to the front, pen and notebook in hand, ready to do the calculations.

Time passed by minute by minute, and soon it was afternoon.

Midway the intern knocked on the office door and asked Professor Winniberg to go to lunch, but he refused.

"Finally done!"

Suddenly, Professor Winniberg looked up, his eyes filled with relief and relief.

The puzzle that had plagued him for more than twenty years had finally been solved!

"But who the hell solved the Sitapan conjecture, damn it! Why do you always have to be anonymous when reviewing! "

Professor Winniberg was a little helpless.

He put more effort into the Sitapan conjecture than anyone else in academia.

Others studied the Sitapan conjecture and suddenly became interested, tried to try, felt that they had hit a wall, and immediately switched the head of the gun.

And when he was young, he was proud and slammed his head against the wall of Sitapan conjecture, and it was more than a year.

In the end, it was under the advice of his mentor that he finally gave up this conjecture.

So he wanted to know more than anyone who had proved the Sitapan conjecture.

However, when reviewing, all papers are anonymous.

Unless you are a real top star in academia and have a good relationship with the editor, it is possible to know who the author of the paper is before it is published in the journal.

But Professor Winnie Burke is not.

Although he has some achievements in the field of computer science and mathematics, he is still far from the real big guy.

After thinking about it, he replied a message to the editorial office: "There is no problem with me verifying the paper, but I have a small request, I wonder if you can tell me who the author of the paper is?" "

After the message was sent, he had no motivation to go to the laboratory, just half lying in a chair in the office in a silent daze.

Journal of Symbolic Logic.

Editor Mitz is still reviewing manuscripts one by one.

"Huh, the review emails I sent out, all the messages were returned so quickly?"

Mitz was a little surprised.

Generally speaking, it is rare to get a reply within a day or two of sending a paper to a reviewer, after all, everyone has their own things to do.

If they are not very interested in the research content of the paper, reviewers often read it in about a week.

"It seems that there are still many people in the academic community who are paying attention to the Sitapan conjecture."

Mitz opened the reply emails one by one.

"Verify correct!"

"Unmistakable!"

"Unmistakable..."

Watching the three reviewers verify that the argument process was correct, Mitz couldn't help but nod.

"Well, since the reviewers all think it's okay, you can consider publishing it in a journal."

But Professor Winniberg asked me to tell him the name of the person who wrote the paper, and he wouldn't think it was written by a famous professor in academia, right? "

Mitz thought about it and decided to give Professor Winniberg a clear reply.

After all, all reviewers have replied, and the paper can be 100% sure that it will be published in the journal, and the name will still be known by then.

It's just a problem of one hour in the morning and one hour later, which is not a lot of violations.

Moreover, he had heard about Professor Winniberg's youth, and he had some sympathy in his heart.

So Mitz sent an email to Professor Winniberg: "Sir, the author of the paper is called Xu.Ning, he should not be a well-known person in academia, but a newcomer, at least I have not found any news about him on the academic network." "

After sending it out, he wrote back to the university side: "The paper has passed the review process and will be published in the journal next month..."

Feilu's 18th anniversary brand upgrade to give back to readers! Charge 100 and get 500 VIP bonds!

immediately preemptive(Event Period: August 10th to August 20th)