Therefore, people outside can't see the scene inside the car at all, which means that as long as Ai Nien and Ling Youting don't get out of the car, no one can confidently point out that the two people in the car are the two of them. Lai Luo refused to admit it, because he only saw the car, but couldn't see the people inside
Just wait patiently, wait for Ling Youting to slowly recover his sanity, wait for Yu Tian to go crazy enough and leave, as long as no one takes out the infrared camera at night and points her at her, they will take pictures of them getting off the car.
It can be treated as if nothing happened.

So what if someone else was there?
As long as there were not a large number of onlookers who saw it with their own eyes, and at the same time someone accidentally took a photo or video, it was equivalent to no evidence to indicate how many people were in the car and their identities.

If Yu Tian mentioned this matter to others, Ai Nien could not only deny it at all, but could also accuse Yu Tian of spreading rumors and infringing her right of reputation.

After all, from a legal point of view, the confession of only one person cannot be used as direct evidence.Moreover, photos and videos taken by the public themselves cannot be used as evidence in court under normal circumstances.

For example, if a woman discovers that her husband is cheating and hires a private detective to secretly take pictures, no matter what kind of photos she takes, they cannot be used as evidence in court.

However, if she secretly followed her husband, watched her husband and mistress enter the hotel room, and reported that there was an absconded criminal in this hotel room, then the police would directly break into the room to arrest the "suspect" and see The scene where the husband and the mistress are together.

In that case, when the lady applied to the court for a divorce, those civil servants would become her "absolute witnesses", proving the fact that her husband had cheated, so that she could gain more benefits in the court divorce.

Of course, this is just an example to illustrate what kind of evidence is valid in court, and it is not recommended for anyone to follow suit.Reporting a false J is a very inappropriate wrongdoing in itself, and it can only be said that the man is at fault in this marriage if it proves that the man cheated, so that the woman may obtain certain benefits when the two parties divorce.

Moreover, except for some people with special occupations, derailment within marriage does not violate the law at all, it is only criticized by morality, and the benefits of the woman in court are very limited.But declaring a fake J is a real big mistake, and it's not worth it at all.

So, in the same way, as long as Ai Nien and Ling Youting stay in the car, Yu Tian has nothing to do with them.

Even if Yu Tian called the police, they could only serve as witnesses for Yu Tian.

However, the actions of Ling Youting and Ai Nien did not violate the law, and Yu Tian and Ling Youting had no legal relationship.Even if the police came, they would probably only feel that Yu Tian wasted energy and made them exhausted, and then said to Yu Tian angrily, "Your life is none of your business".

If Yu Tian told others about this matter in a fit of anger, it would be a completely ignorant behavior.

For one thing, she relied on her mouth without evidence, so others might not believe it;

Secondly, this will bring a lot of influence and trouble to Ling Youting, and may even cause him to lose his original position as the future Patriarch, and he will be divorced from Yu Tian since then;

Tap the screen to use advanced tools Tip: You can use left and right keyboard keys to browse between chapters.

You'll Also Like